Questions from Business Law


Q: Why was Sisuphan convicted of embezzlement instead of larceny? What is

Why was Sisuphan convicted of embezzlement instead of larceny? What is the difference between these two crimes?

See Answer

Q: If Miller and Marcum had used smartphones and U.S.

If Miller and Marcum had used smartphones and U.S. Cellular had stored its records in the “cloud,” would the outcome likely have been different? Explain.

See Answer

Q: Are Salvatore’s actions likely to affect his business’s ability to profit in

Are Salvatore’s actions likely to affect his business’s ability to profit in the long run? Discuss.

See Answer

Q: Does an organization have an ethical obligation to secure a safe and

Does an organization have an ethical obligation to secure a safe and harassment-free workplace for its employees? Discuss.

See Answer

Q: Suppose that Case Western had tolerated Al-Dabagh’s conduct and awarded

Suppose that Case Western had tolerated Al-Dabagh’s conduct and awarded him a diploma. What impact might that have had on other students at the school? Why?

See Answer

Q: How did the objective theory of contracts affect the result in this

How did the objective theory of contracts affect the result in this case? Explain.

See Answer

Q: What did the amount of the jury’s award of $686,

What did the amount of the jury’s award of $686,000 in damages represent? Explain.

See Answer

Q: How might the result in this case have been different if the

How might the result in this case have been different if the court had allowed Wagner’s extrinsic evidence of the prior contract regarding Love Song to be used as evidence in this dispute?

See Answer

Q: Assume that, instead of exchanging e-mails, the attorneys

Assume that, instead of exchanging e-mails, the attorneys for both sides had had a phone conversation that included all of the terms to which they actually agreed in their e-mail exchanges. Would the...

See Answer

Q: How should an offeree indicate a definite lack of consent to a

How should an offeree indicate a definite lack of consent to a counteroffer?

See Answer