Questions from Business Law

Q: Should incidental beneficiaries have any legal recourse against parties who do not

Should incidental beneficiaries have any legal recourse against parties who do not perform their contracts? Why or why not?

Q: The Health Care Providers Self Insurance Trust (the trust) provided

The Health Care Providers Self Insurance Trust (the trust) provided workers’ compensation coverage to the employees of its members, including Accredited Aides Plus, Inc. The trust contracted with Prog...

Q: Should the courts allow the defense of impossibility of performance to be

Should the courts allow the defense of impossibility of performance to be be used more often?

Q: Lisa Goldstein reserved space for a wedding in a building owned by

Lisa Goldstein reserved space for a wedding in a building owned by Orensanz Events, LLC, in New York City. The rental agreement provided that on cancellation of the event “for any reason beyond” Orens...

Q: Should merchants be required to act in good faith? Why or

Should merchants be required to act in good faith? Why or why not?

Q: Camal Terry signed a “Sales Contract” to buy a 1995

Camal Terry signed a “Sales Contract” to buy a 1995 BMW 3 Series from Robin Drive Auto, a car dealership in Delaware. Terry agreed to pay $4,995 and Robin Drive agreed to hold the BMW for him in conte...

Q: When can a person refuse to give information to law enforcement officers

When can a person refuse to give information to law enforcement officers?

Q: If the parties to a contract do not specify when the risk

If the parties to a contract do not specify when the risk of loss passes, the risk generally rests with the party who has possession of the goods or the right to their possession. Why is this the rule...

Q: Indiana enacted the Vapor Pens and E-Liquid Act to regulate

Indiana enacted the Vapor Pens and E-Liquid Act to regulate the manufacture and distribution of e-cigarettes. The act was based on the state’s interest in public health and safety. Requirements includ...

Q: How does the doctrine of commercial impracticability attempt to balance the rights

How does the doctrine of commercial impracticability attempt to balance the rights of both parties to a contract?