Q: Under the doctrine of stare decisis, courts are obligated to follow
Under the doctrine of stare decisis, courts are obligated to follow the precedents established in their jurisdictions unless there is a compelling reason not to. Should U.S. courts continue to adhere...
See AnswerQ: In this age of the Internet, when people communicate via e
In this age of the Internet, when people communicate via e-mail, texts, tweets, Facebook, and Skype, is the concept of jurisdiction losing its meaning?
See AnswerQ: Some consumer advocates argue that high attorney contingency fees—sometimes reaching
Some consumer advocates argue that high attorney contingency fees—sometimes reaching 40 percent—unfairly deprive winning plaintiffs of too much of their awards. Should the government put a cap on cont...
See AnswerQ: Legislation aimed at “protecting people from themselves” concerns the individual
Legislation aimed at “protecting people from themselves” concerns the individual as well as the public in general. Protective helmet laws are just one example of such legislation. Should individuals b...
See AnswerQ: Executives in large corporations are ultimately rewarded if their companies do well
Executives in large corporations are ultimately rewarded if their companies do well, particularly as evidenced by rising stock prices. Consequently, should we let those who run corporations decide wha...
See AnswerQ: Ben contracts with Amy to fix her roof. Amy writes Ben
Ben contracts with Amy to fix her roof. Amy writes Ben a check, but Ben never makes the repairs. Carl knows Ben breached the contract but cashes the check anyway. Can Carl become an HDC? Why or why no...
See AnswerQ: Each time a state legislature enacts a law that applies the assumption
Each time a state legislature enacts a law that applies the assumption of risk doctrine to a particular sport, participants in that sport suffer.
See AnswerQ: All liability suits against tobacco companies for lung cancer should be thrown
All liability suits against tobacco companies for lung cancer should be thrown out of court now and forever.
See AnswerQ: Congress has amended copyright law several times so that copyright holders now
Congress has amended copyright law several times so that copyright holders now have protection for many decades. Was Congress right in extending these copyright time periods? Why or why not?
See AnswerQ: Because of over criminalization, particularly by the federal government, Americans
Because of over criminalization, particularly by the federal government, Americans may be breaking the law regularly without knowing it. Should Congress rescind many of the more than four thousand fed...
See Answer