Q: Why did APB Opinion No. 8 only minimally improve uniformity between
Why did APB Opinion No. 8 only minimally improve uniformity between companies?
See AnswerQ: Why was there reason to expect some negative economic consequences arising from
Why was there reason to expect some negative economic consequences arising from lease capitalization? What is the role of neutrality in such a situation? What is the response based on research finding...
See AnswerQ: Does it matter if capital leases are reported in a footnote or
Does it matter if capital leases are reported in a footnote or in the body of the balance sheet? What research evidence exists to help evaluate this question?
See AnswerQ: Describe the implicit assumption made in SFAS No. 94 about the
Describe the implicit assumption made in SFAS No. 94 about the reporting entity.
See AnswerQ: Is SFAS No. 87’s argument favoring recognition of a pension liability
Is SFAS No. 87’s argument favoring recognition of a pension liability for accumulated benefits consistent with the conceptual framework project?
See AnswerQ: How are minority interests handled in consolidations?
How are minority interests handled in consolidations?
See AnswerQ: Why is the IASB standard (IAS 7) substantially shorter than
Why is the IASB standard (IAS 7) substantially shorter than the FASB’s standard (SFAS No. 13)?
See AnswerQ: Why does the elimination of poolings (SFAS No. 141)
Why does the elimination of poolings (SFAS No. 141) and the indefinite life of goodwill subject to impairment (SFAS No. 142) represent a possible “quid pro quo?”
See AnswerQ: Why does the elimination of poolings improve representational faithfulness and comparability.
Why does the elimination of poolings improve representational faithfulness and comparability.
See Answer